Monday, May 27, 2013

Where did our name come from?


“ROCKHOLT Could be a variant of the Germanic “Rockolt”, a variant of “Rocholt”, or “Rocholl”; thought to be from variants of  a Germanic personal name, “Hrokwald”, composed of the elements hrok (prudence) or (care) + wald (rule),  and by others thought to be of Slavic origin.  I also found reference to the name, as being “Rockwell”, formally Rockholt, from old English:  hroc (rook) + holt (wood), of Buckinghamshire and Somerset, England.  I have not been able to source anything in England or Germany that leads me to strongly believe in one idea over the other.

While I did find many sources of Rockholt’s in Germany in the 17th and 18th century, the given names were all in the Germanic form, such as Karl, Johanna, Helmut or Wilhelm.  Our family is full of those named John, Robert and William, all of which could have been anglicized versions of the Germanic form.  In England, the Rockwell name is present.  I did find a few Rockhould and Rockhole references but was able to eliminate them with parallel references to Rockwell, which I found to be the correct listing.  I have made contact with a few Rockholts in Sweden but are still trying to break the language barrier.

So, what does all this mean?  From my perspective, and it’s simply my “learned opinion” at best:  With the Virginia colony being English, and the settlers being English, which at that time also included England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales (at least to some extent), it is easy to assume that the settlers were for the most part English.  There were some, but not a lot, of Dutch settlers in the early days of the English colonies, but the Germans did not show up until after the revolutionary war.  I believe our original American immigrant, Robert Rockhould, left England and moved first to the Netherlands, where he married and began the family.  Once the new world settlements were somewhat established, he moved his family to Virginia.

Either our ancestors were English, Rockwell’s turned Rockhould, turned Rockhold and Rockholt, or they were of German extraction, some how moved through England leaving no trace behind (at least I have not found it yet).  I doubt there can be clear, concise proof short of a lot of DNA research.

From all I have been able to determine, our early ancestors immigrated to America from the Netherlands.  Indications are that the earliest was Robert Rockhould, who probably left England for Holland in the turmoil of the religious uprisings of the early 1600s.  Some time passed while he was in Holland, he married and had children before departing for the English colony of Virginia in 1637.  Tracing our ancestry into the Netherlands or England, during the time of Robert, is proving very difficult.  While there is great evidence of German movement into England prior to the 1600’s, there is little recorded history from which information can be gathered.   Some of the wives of the earliest found American Rockholts were of Welch and Scottish birth, leading me to believe that the early Rockholts, while maybe of German extraction, were English.  I have found records of Rockhoulds in Faizhead, Somerset, England in the church records of St James.  There are also records for the Rockwells.  Maybe the names were recorded in error, maybe both surnames existed.  More research is needed.

Virginia had its’ own problems with religious practices and that seems to be the reason Robert and his family left Virginia to join other English in the new colony of Maryland where religious freedom was to be available.  History tells us otherwise, but the colonist prevailed in their revolt  against British rule, first gaining independence, then eventually ceding the government back over to Colonial rule with assurances of religious freedom.  But, in time the Colonial rule just proved too much and the Revolutionary War was on.

Our family members have been present in every major war/uprising, sometimes even on opposing sides.  Robert was an armourer by trade, active in the Savern and Patuxent  uprising.  He was, from what I  can find, a prosperous individual.  His name is found as being indebted to on several wills.   At the same time it appears that he did not get involved in politics, his name is not found on any documents relating to government.

The Virginia  Colony seems to be the earliest settling of the Rockholt/Rockhold families in the Americas.   From there they moved into Maryland and down into Tennessee, into the Carolinas, and New York .  They seemed to spread out, generally as the Unitied States expanded, so did the family.  Farmers, craftsmen, school teachers, railroad men, preachers, boat builders, merchants, solders, sailers and statesman.  They seem to have ventured into about every aspect of the nation, both in occupation and in location, There is today a large number of Rockholts in Tennessee, they are also concentrated in Texas, Arkansas, Alabama and California.

Variants of the name, be they the result of intentional or unintentional change, have been found while researching the family genealogy.  While today our line spells the family name “ROCKHOLT”, it appears also as ROCKHOLD.  The use of Rockhould seems to have been only used for two or three generations  The family ROCKWELL seems to have originated from some source other than Robert Rockhould, even though you will find any number of Rockwell family trees that show Robert as their American origin.  The Rockwell Foundation (Norman Rockwell) has done a lot of DNA research and pretty much ruled out Robert from their line.  There is one ROCKHOLD family line originating in Maine in the late 1600s which does not appear to associate with our Robert and his descendents, but could well come from the same origin.

And the search continues.

 

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

WHAT'S IN A NAME?


I have an original duplicate of my birth certificate, so there is no doubt of my name; it’s spelling, or who my legal parents are.  The same cannot be said of many of our ancestors.  For instance,  Robert Rockwell, or Rockhole, or Rockhold, or Rockholt?  He was born 4 Jul 1800, or was it 1804, or maybe even 1809.  His father was Loyd or maybe Lloyd Rockhold.

Whether in census pages , public records, church records, bible entries, on tombstones or in history books, there seems to be no end to the name/date game.

The upper New England Rockwell’s first aligned themselves with our Robert Rockhould (Virginia), but then DNA evidence proved them not , and now they are not related – sorry, their loss.

Onomastics or onomatology is the study or history of names.  I found reference to the name, “Rockwell”, formally Rockholt, from old English = hroc (rook) + holt (wood), of Buckinghamshire and Somerset.

Some of the early family went with Rockhold, some with Rockholt, even some with Rockwell.  I have found records that clearly relate to the same individual, but with the name being different.  Sometimes this could simply be the spelling by the individual recording the data, such as the census takers, the church deacon, or the town clerk.  Since so many of our early ancestors could not read or write (as indicated on the census records) it is understandable that there could always be some mix-up.

If you are new to this genealogy stuff, and just beginning to look into your family line, a word of caution:  Don’t believe everything you find, and don’t believe just because you can’t find it, it isn’t so.  If you’re searching, try alternate spellings:  William can be Wm, or Will, or Willy, or Willie, sometimes it’s simply Bill or Billy.  Elizabeth is also Eliza, Liza, Lizzy, El and Liz.  Don’t get hung up on the spelling.

Dates are yet another problem.  Very early dates (colonial period) are often recorded on the old calendar and therefore could be off a couple years from today’s calendar.  Ages listed on census page entries are often the best guess of who ever provided the data to the census taker, and, in some cases, it’s simply a matter of an individual not wanting to reveal his/her real age.

Handwritten records sometimes are just unclear, is that a 4 or is it a 9 that the top is simply not closed up?  Is that a U or a V?  Sometimes it’s a matter of who’s guess is best.  I even found one individual recorded in two census pages.  On one page she is in the family home, in the other, four days later, she is in the home of her sister and brother-in-law, along with her 1/12 year old nephew.

Happy hunting!

Monday, May 20, 2013

The French Connection

French citizens who embraced the Protestant teachings of the 16th-century reformation were known as Huguenots. Because they were unwelcome in Catholic France, hundreds of thousands left their native land, with several thousand eventually making their way to the British colonies in North America. Huguenots, generally prosperous and well educated, were among the immigrant groups who were rapidly assimilated into the dominant English culture of Colonial America.

Huguenots had attempted to settle in Florida (near present day St. Augustine), the Carolinas, and the Guanabara Bay (in present-day Brazil) during the late 16th century, but none of the settlements was successful. The first Huguenots to settle successfully in the Americas sailed from the Netherlands early in the 17th century, and a small number followed throughout the century. Our ancestor, Augustine Jean, was born on the Isle of Jersey so we can assume his father, Edmond Jean was one of the very early to leave France seeking religious freedom.

Augustine Jean, b. 9 Jan 1647, arrived in the Massachusetts colony in the spring of 1675, settling first in Reading then on to Falmouth in 1680. He served in King Philips War 1675/76 (first Indian War) under both Captains Beers and Turner. His wife, Elizabeth Brown (b. 26 Mar 1657) was probably an English resident of the colony, it was not common to record much of the women’s activities but there is record of their marriage in 1677.

Augustine and Elizabeth’s son John Gustin (1691-1777) and his wife Mary, produced Elizabeth Gustin who married Abraham Covalt, who were the parents of Zuriah Covalt who married Jonathan Taylor Buck in 1775. Their daughter, Elizabeth, married our Loyd Rockhold. And that’s the French Connection.

Note: My narrative is generally written specifically with my own family and ancestry in mind. There will often times be instances where references that I make will not necessarily be connected to your own ancestry, we have just too many Loyds, Roberts, Williams and Elizabeths in the extended family for it not to be confusing. MDR

Monday, May 13, 2013

Dawson Rockhold and the Revolutionary War


The Flying Camp Battalion

Our Dawson Charles Rockhold (my 4th Great Grandfather), 1746-1840, was a member of the Maryland Flying Camp.

On December 8, 1774 an act was passed in Frederick to prepare for the worst, a revolution. The act enabled citizens to start organizing companies for military use. It stated that all companies should start drilling and enlisted volunteers between the ages of 16 and 50. A company called the Game Cock was attached to a Flying Camp Battalion, which was organized in Toms Creek Hundred, Maryland in early spring of 1775 due to the act. The Flying Camp Battalion consisted of three companies that were raised in the Toms Creek Hundred-Mechanicstown area that were soon re-organized into the Maryland Regiments.

Today when you hear the term ""Flying Camp Battalion"" it’s being referred to as an association to Captains Blair, Shields, or Ogle. However, with a creation of a small independent regiment was common for the term Flying Camp Battalion to be used as a battalion association for home defense. When these companies were organized into state regiments for service, the term ""Flying Camp"" disappeared.

The term ""Flying Camp Battalion"" was also associated with the German Battalion that was formed from Maryland and Pennsylvania. It had eight companies and the citizens would refer to them as a Flying Camp Battalion. In reality, they were also given a battalion designation of the Pennsylvania Line commonly associated with the Maryland Line. That’s why when the battalion was transferred to Maryland it was supposed to become the 8th Maryland Regiment, but Maryland never officially recognized the German Battalion as a state regiment.

So what was a Flying Camp Battalion?

By June 1776, General Washington appealed to the Continental Congress for more troops. Maryland responded by organizing the ""Maryland Flying Camp"" of 3400 militia troops. The Flying Camp was then authorized to join the Continental Army, and assigned to fight beside troops from Delaware and Pennsylvania in the area of operations stretching from Maryland to New York. General George Washington wanted a 10,000 man strategic mobile reserve originally conceived the ""Flying Camp"". Under the command of Brigadier General Hugh Mercer, of Virginia, the flying camp was to be comprised of militia units from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland. Headquartered in Perth Amboy, this force would be expected to perform a number of vital functions in New Jersey while Washington’s army was preoccupied with the defense of New York. Its duties would include guarding the vulnerable Jersey coast, protecting the Continental Army's supply lines, suppressing roving bands of Tories and acting as a ready reserve should Washington have need of reinforcements. (Pennsylvania Archives, 5th Series, Vol. V; History of Bucks County, Davis)

On June 3, 1776, the Continental Congress resolved "that a flying camp be immediately established in the middle colonies." For its part, Pennsylvania was called upon to provide a force of some 6,000 men. Delegations of one officer and two enlisted men from each of Pennsylvania's fifty-three associated battalions met in Lancaster, on July 4, 1776, for the purpose of selecting this force. Then, on July 10, 1776, the Bucks County Committee of Safety, citing "the Resolve of the late Provincial Conference for embodying four hundred of the Associates of this County," appointed the following officers to command. (Pennsylvania Archives, 5th Series, Vol. V; History of Bucks County, Davis)

The flying camp received little support from New Jersey. Pennsylvania sent some 2,000 associates, many of who were quickly drafted into service by Gen. Washington in New York. More men soon arrived from Maryland and Delaware, but despite the best efforts of Gen. Mercer the flying camp was fraught with difficulties almost from its inception, and never realizing its full potential was disbanded by the end of November, shortly after the fall of Fort Washington. (Pennsylvania Archives, 5th Series, Vol. V; History of Bucks County, Davis)

The definition of the Flying Camp Battalion is a Reservist or a Home Guard. Their duties were to serve and protect citizens of the state in case of an invasion. They acted like a police force guarding barracks, government buildings, so on and so forth. Before the Revolutionary War there was no such thing in America as a Reservist or a Home Guard. Therefore, the militia was formed, a group of trained soldiers that could pack up and leave for duty at a moments notice.

During the Revolutionary War, however, the militias were called to active service. This left the state and it’s cities needing protection. A Flying Camp Battalion was organized in Frederick during the early spring of 1775 due to the act that called for independent companies for home service duty. However, there were several regiments called the Flying Camp Battalion that was called for active service by July of 1776. When you read about the Flying Camp Battalion of Toms Creek Hundred, which one is being referred? Here is a list of Flying Camp Battalions that were formed in Maryland and also Pennsylvania in 1776:

Maryland: 1st Regiment Flying Camp, 1776
Maryland: Flying Camp Regiment (Ewing's), 1776
Maryland: Flying Camp Regiment (Griffith's), 1776
Maryland: Flying Camp Regiment (Richardson's), 1776
Pennsylvania: 1st Regiment Flying Camp, 1776
Pennsylvania: 1st Regiment Flying Camp of Lancaster County, 1776
Pennsylvania: 2d Regiment Flying Camp, 1776
Pennsylvania: Baxter's Battalion Flying Camp, 1776
Pennsylvania: Clotz' Battalion Flying Camp, Lancaster County, 1776
Pennsylvania: Haller's Battalion Flying Camp, 1776
Pennsylvania: Swope's Regiment Flying Camp, 1776-80
Pennsylvania: Watt's Regiment Flying Camp, 1776
When Caroline County’s battalions of minutemen were disbanded in August 1776, Richardson was appointed Colonel of the Eastern Shore Battalion of the Maryland Flying Camp. Richardson’s battalion consisted of seven companies from the various Eastern Shore counties, about 650 men in all. Early in the conflict, troops were provisioned mostly from local stores. Richardson also received supplies, including firearms, from Annapolis and Baltimore to be distributed among the various companies of his regiment. Richardson may have used the landing and storage facilities at Gilpin Point, and possibly his own sailing vessels, to import and supply his regiment at this time, and later during his Eastern Shore campaign. Provisioning the troops was difficult and caused delays before Richardson and his 4th Maryland Battalion of the Flying Camp could join the Continental Army at Elizabethtown, New Jersey, on September 8, 1776.

In 1776 Captain William Smallwood had the only Maryland unit that was called to active duty. Of these companies in Smallwood’s Battalion was the Game Cock Company commanded by Captain William Blair. William Blair was a Toms Creek Hundred citizen, who attended the Troxell meeting at Tom’s Creek on Sunday August 28, 1770. The second Company was under the command of Captain William Shields who also attended the Troxell meeting in 1770. Captain Benjamin Ogle raised the Third Company. More than a hundred and fifty soldiers that were ready for military use manned these companies.

Upon the arrival of the news that a war had started up North in Massachusetts, Frederick County, Maryland proposed a general movement for the enlistment of volunteers. There were two companies raised, Michael Cresap was captain of the first company, with Thomas Warren, Joseph Cresap, Jr., and Richard Davis, Jr., lieutenants. Captain Cresap’s company was composed of a hundred and thirty backwoodsmen. Of the second company Thomas Price who was captain, and Otho Holland Williams and John Key as lieutenants. The Committee of Observation appointed these officers. These companies were to march and join the Continental Army at Boston. A gallant, hardier and more efficient body of men never marched to the defense of their country. The men of this company, many of them educated in the frightful conflicts of the Indian Wars, were skilled in Indian warfare and hardened to Indian discipline, with remarkable skill in the use of their rifles.

Captain Daniel Morgan’s company enlisted in the neighborhood of Shepherdstown, (West) Virginia. These were the first troops from the South to reach the field. A writer, in August 1775, described them upon their arrival as remarkably stout and hardy men, many of them exceeding six feet in height. They were dressed in white frocks or rifle shirts, and round hats. These men were remarkable for the accuracy of their aim, striking a mark with great certainty at two hundred yards distance. During a review of the company, while on a quick advance, they fired their balls into objects of seven inches diameter at the distance of two hundred and fifty yards. Nothing could exceed the satisfaction of General Washington, upon the arrival of this contingent upon whom he could always rely, part of them coming from his own State.

On July 17, 1775 Captain Morgan’s company came into Frederick on their way to Boston. One mile from Frederick they were met by Captain Price’s company as they marched to Boston with Captain Cresap. The Maryland Line was next to be organized. It composed of four companies from Frederick County (three of which were from the Emmitsburg district), and two to three companies from Montgomery County. Colonel William Smallwood would command these companies that were from Frederick County. Captain George Stricker was commissioned, as captain in the Maryland 400 and would later be promoted to Lt. Colonel in a German Regiment that was raised by the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania.

A (Flying Camp) Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment was authorized June 17, 1776 in the Continental Army and was assigned to the Main Army. The Regiment was organized June 27, 1776 to consist of the three existing companies two from Maryland and one from Virginia, plus two new companies to be raised in Maryland, and four new companies to be raised in Virginia. The regimental organization was disbanded with the surviving Virginia portion being transferred on February 3, 1777 to the 11th Virginia Regiment and the Maryland portion provisionally reorganized in November 1776 as a single company under Captain Alexander Lawson Smith and attached to the 4th Maryland Regiment.

The German Regiment

The Continental Congress authorized the recruitment of a German Regiment to be composed of eight companies from Pennsylvania and Maryland. German immigrants first settled the Emmitsburg and Mechanicstown area in 1748. The General Assembly in July of 1776 defined those two companies; each would be raised in Frederick and Baltimore counties. The German Battalion unofficially referred to as the 8th Maryland Regiment under the command of Haussegger's and DeArendt's.

The German Battalion enlisted for three years but served between 1776-1780 and saw action for almost five years at Trenton, White Plains, and Brandywine. In January of 1781 the Regiment was disbanded as a separate entity and was folded into the Maryland Continental Troops, part of the 3rd Maryland Regiment. They marched back to Frederick and then to Baltimore where they were re-equipped to go south to Yorktown.

The Maryland Line and Daniel Morgan's Virginians

On July 18, Daniel Morgan's Company started on their long march to Boston, armed with tomahawk and rifle, dressed in deerskins and moccasins and treading as lightly as the savages themselves. They needed no baggage train or equipment. They used their blankets to wrap themselves in at night and then they slept around the campfire as contentedly as if they had been comfortably housed. As they marched to the field they could easily procure game in almost sufficient quantities for their support, along with a little parched corn as the only provision they had. Before marching, these men gave the people of Frederick an exhibition of their marksmanship. A man would hold a target in his hand or between his knees for the others to aim at, with such confidence in their own skill. Not only did they practice in the ordinary way but assumed various postures, showing in all circumstances the same skill.

Several Maryland militia companies were mustered into service and attached to the Maryland 400 that made up the Maryland Line (1st Maryland Regiment) and was ordered to New York, on July 4, 1776. There the Maryland Line took action in the early part of the war at Brooklyn Heights, New York. This was their first baptism of fire in the war and a very costly battle for them as well. When Captain Blair fell, mortally wounded at the battle of Brooklyn Heights, Captain Henry Williams took charge of the "Game Cock" company. Under Henry’s command, the company participated in many hard-fought battles, with Captain Williams in the thickest of the fray.

After the retreat from New York, the Maryland Line found themselves being recalled to Frederick. According to Williams’ Frederick County History it is stated that, "While in Frederick, a company of the Flying Camp Battalion was then unattached from the Maryland Line and guarded the barracks where Hessian and British soldiers were imprisoned. The barracks housed those taken prisoner from the battles of Saratoga. Trenton, and Yorktown."

During September of 1776 a committee was formed to build a state constitution. On September 6, the convention provided that the upper district of Frederick County should be formed into a new county named Washington along with the lower district forming Montgomery County. On September 12, at the Frederick Court House, Lt. Colonel William Blair, Colonel George Sticker (although a native of Winchester. Virginia), and Colonel Charles Beatty were among some of those chosen for the observation of the committee in forming the Maryland State Constitution. On November 8, the constitution was agreed upon and elections were ordered to carry it into effect. On February 10, 1777 the State Assembly was held and three days later Thomas Johnson was elected Maryland’s first Governor.

In February of 1777, the Maryland Line was reorganized with five new regiments that were raised in Maryland. Colonel William Smallwood of the Maryland 400 was promoted to General and given command of a brigade and French General Debarre was given command of the other brigade. The new command structure placed the Flying Camp Battalion into separate regiments. William Blair was promoted to Lieutenant Colonel of the Third Battalion and William Shields was given the rank of First Major of the same command. Two of Emmitsburg’s companies were placed in the Third Battalion under the command of Thomas Johnson Jr. The Second Battalion enlisted the third company that was from the Toms Creek Hundred and under the command of Colonel James Johnson and Toms Creek Hundred own Benjamin Ogle who was promoted to First Major.

From 1775 to 1777, Maryland had raised eight regiments for the Continental Army. However the German Regiment that was raised in Maryland and Pennsylvania is listed with a Virginia Brigade. The new organization at Valley Forge was as follows:

3rd Division; Major General Sullivan Commanding

1st Maryland Brigade
1st Maryland Regiment Colonels William Smallwood and Francis Ware
3rd Maryland Regiment Colonel Mordecai Gist
5th, Maryland Regiment Colonel William Richardson
7th Maryland Regiment Colonel John Gunby
2nd Maryland Brigade
2nd Maryland Regiment Colonel Thomas Price
4th Maryland Regiment Colonel Josiah C. Hall
6th Maryland Regiment Colonel Otho H. Williams
Delaware Regiment
Hazen's 2nd Canadian Regiment
1st Division; Major General Greene Commanding

1st Virginia Brigade; Brigadier General Muhlenberg

1st Virginia Regiment
5th Virginia Regiment
6th Virginia Regiment
9th Virginia Regiment
3th Virginia Regiment
German Regiment; Brig. Gen. Peter Muhlenberg (Of the eight companies in this regiment, four were raised in Pennsylvania and four from Maryland. It was credited as part of the Pennsylvania Line until February 26, 1778 when it was transferred to the Maryland Line. It was officially designated the 8th Maryland Continental Regiment, but was seldom ever referred to as that.)

Many of those from Toms Creek Hundred who re-enlisted served in the 6th Maryland Regiment that was raised in 1777. In the Matthews family history their ancestor’s names appear on the roster of the 6th Maryland Regiment. They are listed as follows: Corporal Robert Matthew, Corporal Thomas Matthew, and Private William Matthew. The Matthews family also had several family members that served in Williams and Cresap’s Companies that was raised on June 21, 1775. In Blair’s Company George Matthews served as a Sergeant while Conrad Matthews, also a sergeant served in Ogle’s Company. Listed with Ogle’s Company was Private Henry Matthews. These companies were commanded by Colonel William Smallwood and were organized as the First Maryland Regiment.

By 1781, the war for Independence cost Maryland many lives. The Maryland Line had to re-organize with the loss of three regiments. The Maryland Line in 1781 consisted of the 1st MD Regiment, 2d MD Regiment, 3d MD Regiment (In January of 1781 the German Regiment was disbanded into the Maryland Continental Troops, part of the 3rd Maryland Regiment.), 4th MD Regiment, and the 5th MD Regiment. By 1783 the Maryland Line was again re-organized with only two Regiments left that fought the duration of the Revolutionary War. The new organization now had the 1st and 2nd Maryland Regiments, with a small battalion of Maryland troops as re-enforcements. Maryland had paid a heavy price for her freedom during the Revolutionary War and Toms Creek Hundred contributed to her efforts.

If I can find  more specific information, such as engagements or actual dates of involvement I will amend this. All I have right now is data from Rev Pension rolls, which are not very specific. If anyone has located any of the Maryland Regiment rosters I would sure like to see them. My best guess would be Richardson's Regiment, due to family association.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Colonial Virginia, A Beginning:



At the beginning of the seventeenth century all the eastern portion of North America, which afterward became the thirteen original states, was known as Virginia. Great interest in American colonization was awakened throughout the kingdom by a little book on "Western Planting," inspired by Raleigh and written by Richard Hakluyt. Several voyages were made before any permanent settlement was established.

These voyages, undertaken by individuals, had not been successful financially or otherwise. From this cause others were deterred from risking their fortunes in similar enterprises. But the success of various commercial companies which had multiplied in the last half century for the purpose of trading with distant countries, especially of the East India Company, chartered in 1600, naturally suggested similar enterprises for the western world. And further, the corporation as a form of local subordinate government had long been familiar to the English merchant, and readily lent itself to plans of colonial extension.

Accordingly, in 1606, two companies were formed, Virginia was divided into two parts and a part granted to each, the London Company and the Plymouth Company. They obtained a royal charter enabling each to found a colony, granting the right to coin money, raise revenue, and to make laws, but reserving much power to the king. Each was given a block of land a hundred miles square, and the settlements were to be at least one hundred miles apart. The London Company had permission to plant a colony anywhere on the coast between the thirty-fourth and forty-first degrees north latitude, and to what they did we now direct our attention.

Great haste was now made by the London Company in preparing for colonization in America, and on the 19th of December, 1606, three small ships bearing one hundred and five colonists and commanded by Christopher Newport, a famous sea captain, set out upon the wintry sea for the New World. The largest of the vessels, the Susan Constant, was of one hundred tons burden and the smallest of but twenty tons. The voyage was long and dreary, and it consumed the remainder of the winter. On reaching the American shore the weary voyagers were greeted by the singing of birds and the fragrance of flowers. Entering Chesapeake Bay they named the two projecting points at its sides, Cape Henry and Cape Charles, after the two young sons of the king. They chose out one of the great rivers flowing into the bay, left upon it the name of King James and followed it for about thirty miles, and founded a town which also they called after the name of their king.

Thus was founded the first of the permanent settlements which were to multiply and expanded and in three hundred years to grow into the greatest nation of the earth. Let us take a glance at the colonists. It would be difficult to imagine a set of men less fitted to build a colony and found a nation than were those who settled at Jamestown in 1607. Among them were but twelve laborers, a few carpenters, a blacksmith, a mason, a barber, and a tailor, while more than fifty were "gentlemen," that is men without an occupation, idle, shiftless
men who had joined the enterprise without realizing that years of labor were essential to success. But there were a few men of worth in the company. There was Wingfield, who became the first president of of the governing council, the hero of many strange adventures. They soon erected a few tents and small cabins; some, however, found a dwelling place by burrowing into the ground. For a church they nailed a board between two trees, stretched a canvas over it, and beneath this the Rev. Robert Hunt held services according to the rites of the Church of England.

Captain Newport, after spending some weeks exploring the James River, returned with his ships to England, promising to come again as soon as practicable. The colony was soon in a pitiable condition. Arriving too late to plant springs crops, and finding little cleared land fit for cultivation, the men were soon reduced to short rations. The allowance to each man for a day was a pint of wormeaten barley or wheat, made into pottage. Governor Wingfield lacked the ability to rule the men, and there were constant quarrels among them. To their other misfortunes was added a continual fear of Indian attacks; and owing to their
exposure in the swamps and their lack of proper food, they were attacked by fevers. They died sometimes three or four in a night, and before the end of September half of the little colony, including Gosnold, had found a grave in the wilderness.

The entire colony would no doubt have perished before the return of Newport but for the courage and vigor of one man, the most notable and conspicuous character in the early colonial history of America -- John Smith. Smith was still a young man, but according to his own story, his record was an extraordinary one. When scarcely beyond boyhood he joined the French army and later that of the Netherlands in which he
served for several years. He then embarked on the Mediterranean and was thrown overboard as a heretic, swam to an uninhabited island, was picked up by a vessel and carried to Egypt. We next find him traversing Italy on foot, slaying three Turks successively in single combat in Transylvania, and at length captured by the Turks and sold into slavery. He slew his master with a flail, escaped into the Scythian Desert, wandered through every country of Europe, and joined the Virginia colonists soon after reaching his native land. It was now left for his sojourn in the American forest to furnish the crowning romance of his life.While exploring the Chickahominy River he was taken captive by the Indians. After entertaining his captors for several days with a pocket compass and such curios, he was condemned to death by the savages. His head was laid on the block when at the last moment a little daughter of the chief, named Pocahontas, rushed forward, laid her head upon the head of the intended victim, and begged that his life be spared. Her request was granted, and he was sent back rejoicing to his people.

This romantic story, as also the account of his other adventures above mentioned, rests wholly on Smith's own testimony, and most historical writers in recent years are disposed to discredit them, especially the story of his rescue by the Indian girl. It seems clear that John Smith gave a highly colored narrative in relating his adventures, but there is reason to believe that the story of his rescue by Pocahontas is true.The only ground for doubting the story is Smith's well-known spirit of boasting and the fact that in his first account of his capture by the Indians he does not mention this incident. On the other hand, there is one powerful argument, which seems almost conclusive, in favor of the truth of the story. It was not an unusual occurrence among many Indian tribes, when they were about to put a captive to death, for some impulsive Indian, usually a female and in most cases a member of the chief's family, to be the life of the intended victim at the last moment.7 Such a request was seldom denied, and the rescue was usually followed by a formal adoption of the rescued one into the tribe; and this is exactly what Smith claimed was done in his case, though he was given his freedom to return to his colony. How could he have invented a story coinciding so perfectly with an Indian custom with which he could not have been familiar? Such a thing is far less credible than the story itself. It is not disputed, however, that John Smith was a man of wonderful energy, and that he did more for Virginia than any other of the early settlers. He soon became governor of the colony, and he saved the colonists from starvation by trading with the Indians for corn. He succeeded above all others in keeping the men at work and thus laid the foundations for future prosperity. Smith later explored Chesapeake Bay and its rivers and afterward the New England coast, and he made maps of them that are remarkable for their accuracy.

Of Pocahontas it is known that although she was a rollicking, romping girl who often visited Jamestown and amused the colonists with her pranks, she grew into stately womanhood and married one of the colonists, John Rolfe, a widower -- that she accompanied her husband to England, where she was received with great favor, and that she died in England after giving birth to a son who afterward made Virginia his home and became the ancestor of several of the most prominent families of the state.

Let us return to our colony. Life in the forest bore heavily on the little band, and but thirty-eight of them were alive when, in January, 1608, Captain Newport returned with food supplies and one hundred and twenty more colonists. Others came from time to time, and in 1609, when John Smith returned to England, the colony numbered five hundred. The government had been placed, by the first charter, in the hands of a council of thirteen, resident in England, and appointed by the King, which should cooperate with a local council. But a new charter was granted in 1609 by which the council in England, originally distinct from the company, now became a part of it,8 while the local council was abolished, being superseded by a governor. By this charter the bounds of the settlement were enlarged to four hundred miles along the coast, two hundred miles each way from Old Point Comfort, and extended "up into the land throughout from sea to sea west and northwest." The company was also given much greater power than that granted by the charter of 1606.Lord de La Warr, of Delaware, was appointed governor of Virginia under the charter of 1609. He embarked with nine ships and five hundred men and women for Virginia; but encountering a terrible storm off the Bermuda Islands, he was delayed at those islands for many months -- and woe to Virginia in consequence!

The "Starving Time" came. The Indians were now hostile and no food could be obtained from them. Men with blanched faces wandered about actually dying for food. The death rate was frightful. Of the five hundred left by Smith the fall before only sixty remained alive in the spring of 1610. These now decided to abandon Virginia and embark in the four little pinnaces that were left them, hoping to reach dear old England. Early in June they gathered together their meager possessions, and with the funeral roll of drums left their cabins behind. Sadly, yet joyfully, they floated down the river to its mouth, when lo! far off in the horizon they beheld a moving speck -- and another and another! They waited -- and up the bay swept the ships of Lord Delaware! They all now returned to Jamestown, and the colony of Virginia was born again.  How slender the thread on which hung the infant life of the firstborn of the United States!

Delaware soon had the colony on its feet, but the next year he returned to England and sent Sir Thomas Dale to govern in his stead. Dale was a man of much ability and strength of character, and as Fiske aptly puts it, "Under his masterful guidance Virginia came out from the valley of the shadow of death." He introduced several radical reforms, the most important of which was the partial abolishing of communism. Before his coming the land and other possessions were held in common; no one owned private property; each man was a servant of the state, and the tendency of many was to do as little as possible. Dale gave each of the old settlers three acres of ground with the right of possessing private property. The effect was to stimulate industry, and from this time there was never a scarcity of food in Virginia. The new governor also
established other settlements along the James, and although he was an austere man, ruled with a hand of iron, and was merciless in his punishment of criminals, his years' stay wrought a great change for the better in Virginia.

In 1612, during the incumbency of Dale, a third charter was granted to Virginia. This charter added the Bermuda Islands to Virginia, empowered the company to raise money by means of lotteries, and was far more liberal than either of its predecessors in granting governmental powers. It is interesting to note the first steps toward democratic government in America as shown by the rapidly succeeding charters of Virginia. King James, blindly devoted to the autocratic theory of government, refused to embody any democratic features in the first charter. The local council was subject to a superior council resident in England, and both were under the instructions of the king. The charter guaranteed the rights of Englishmen to the people, but gave them no voice in their own government. But the colony came to the verge of failure, and in the belief that a more liberal government would enhance the prospects of success, a second charter was applied for and granted. By this charter of 1609, all vacancies in the council, as also the executive office, were to be filled by the vote of the stockholders. This gave the company the character of a body politic, the right of self-government. It was a great advance over the first one in the process of transplanting English government to American soil, a great step toward the more important charter of 1612. By this third charter all governmental power, including the making of their own laws and the choosing of all officials, was given into the hands of the stockholders. But the company did not immediately extend this right to the colonists; it placed local affairs in the hands of a governor of its own choosing. A few years later, however, the liberal element, led by Sir Edwin Sandys, gained control of the company, and to attract new settlers, as well as to curb the power of a profligate or tyrannical governor, the company instructed its governor to call an assembly of the settlers and give them a share in the government. This became the House of Burgesses -- the first representative body in America. Meantime the white and red races were united in Virginia by the marriage of Rolfe and the daughter of the Indian chief Powhatan. This secured peace with the Indians for eight years until the death of Powhatan.

About 1616 tobacco became the staple product of the colony. The English learned its use from the Indians, and marvelously soon after the discovery of the weed, the use of it spread through every civilized land. It was the one thing that found a ready sale in England. Every farmed raised tobacco, and it was grown in the streets of Jamestown; it even became the money of the colony, and the minister and public officers were paid their salaries in tobacco.

The colony was, on the whole, a disappointment to the company that had founded it. One of the main object was the same that had lured Pizarro and De Soto -- a desire for gold. They were not content with the sassafras roots and cedar logs that their ships kept bringing, nor even with the tobacco. When, therefore, the London Company, or Virginian Company, as named by the second charter, were convinced that gold could not be found in that part of America, their interest in the colony was greatly diminished, and to this fact was due much of the anarchy and disorder in Virginia.

After the departure of Dale, the colonists suffered severely for a few years at the hands of a wicked governor, Samuel Argall, who robbed and plundered them in every way in his power. But better times were at hand. At about this time, Sir Edwin Sandys gained the ascendency in the Virginia Company, and his energy and wisdom were soon felt in the colony. One of his first acts was to send the colony, in 1619, one of its best governors, Sir George Yeardley, who became the first to introduce popular government into America.

The most memorable year in the early history of Virginia was 1619. It was this year that witnessed the beginnings of two institutions, opposite in character, each of which was destined to play a great part in the future development of the new nation that was now struggling to be born. The first was government by the people, and the second the institution of slavery. The first was to increase and expand until it developed into the greatest self-governing people in the world's history; the second was to fasten itself like a blight on the free institutions of the same people and in the end to bring about the sacrifice of tens of thousands of human lives. In November of the preceding year the Virginia Company had issued an order limiting the power of the governor of the colony and establishing a legislature of burgesses to be elected by the people.

The first House of Burgesses, composed of twenty-two delegates, met in July, 1619, soon after the coming of Yeardley, and before long the people were living under the laws of their own making, and a "government of the people, for the people, and by the people" thus gained its first foothold on American soil. This granting of a share in the government to the people attracted new settlers, who, from this time, came in ever increasing numbers. This same year of 1619 witnessed the coming of ninety young women to be wives of the colonists. To secure one of these prizes the bachelor planter was required to win the maiden's consent and to pay her passage across the sea (about one hundred and twenty pounds of tobacco), and as there were many more men than maidens, the courtship must have been very interesting. Other women were brought from time to time, and family life was soon firmly established in the new colony.

Indeed, from this time forth life in Virginia had its attractions as well as its hardships. The lowing of the herds, the chattering of the fowls, the shouts of playing children, the sound of the builder's hammer, and of the woodman's ax ringing out from the depth of the forest, bespoke a happy and prosperous community. But colonial life still had its misfortunes. A great calamity befell the people of Virginia in 1622 in the form of an Indian massacre. The friendly chief Powhatan was dead, and his brother Opekankano, who had never been friendly to the English, now reigned in his stead. This chief now instituted a massacre in which three hundred and forty-seven of the settlers were killed. The blow was a dreadful one; but the whites, recovering from the shock, pursued the savages with merciless fury, putting to death a far greater number than they had lost. Twenty-two years later this same chief, now an aged man, made a second attack on the settlement, killing over two hundred, but his tribe was again put down with a firm hand and himself taken captive and put to death.

In 1624, the Virginia Company, after a severe struggle with the Crown, was deprived of its charter. The chief cause of this was that the Puritan element, which formed the backbone of the opposition in Parliament, had also gained the ascendency in the Virginia Company. Nor did James likes the action of the company a few years before in extending representative government to the colonists. The result was the loss of the charter. Virginia became a royal colony and so it continued to the war of the Revolution. But the change had little effect on the colony, for Charles I, who soon came to the throne, was so occupied with troubles at home that he gave less attention to the government of Virginia than the company had done, and popular government continued to flourish. Of the six thousand people who had come from England before 1625 only one fifth now remained alive, but this number was rapidly augmented by immigration. Governor Yeardley died in 1627, and John Harvey, a man of little ability or character, became governor. Harvey kept the Virginians in turmoil for some years, but the colony was now so firmly established that his evil influence did not greatly affect its prosperity.

And that was the Virginia that welcomed our ancestors Robert and Sarah (Greniffe) Rockhould and their children.

[I realize that my narrative is not in any particular order, I simply work on a given topic for a while and when it looks like it has became somewhat organized, I publish it here,.  If someday in the future I have the opportunity (time and energy) I will organize it all in correct order and maybe even publish it.  If not, oh well, it's been a real adventure to research it all.  Other segments can be found in previous posts.  Thanks to all who have reviewed and commented on the post. MDR]